The File Drawer Effect and Publication Rates in Menstrual Cycle Research
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Vol. 11 (2) , 233-242
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00786.x
Abstract
The file drawer problem refers to a publication bias for positive results, leading to studies which support the null hypothesis being relegated to the file drawer. The assumption is that researchers are unable to publish studies with nonsignificant findings. A survey of investigators studying the menstrual cycle showed this assumption to be unwarranted. Much of the research did not lend itself to a hypothesis-testing model. A more important contribution to the likelihood of publication was research productivity, and researchers whose first study was published were more likely to have continued their work.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women and publishing in psychology.American Psychologist, 1985
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Clinical psychologists' judgments of the scientific merit and clinical relevance of psychotherapy outcome research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- The premenstrual syndrome.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Statistical significance in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Much Ado About the Null Hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- The test of significance in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin, 1966
- A note on the inconclusiveness of accepting the null hypothesis.Psychological Review, 1964
- Further Considerations on Testing the Null Hypothesis and the Strategy and Tactics of Investigating Theoretical Models.Psychological Review, 1963