Discrepancies Between Findings of Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Studies in Adult Life: Physique and Physiology
- 1 January 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Human Development
- Vol. 8 (1) , 16-22
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000270227
Abstract
Whereas cross-sectional surveys suggest that height, grip strength, and vital capacity should all decrease between the ages of 18-19 and 56 or later, no such decrease was observed in longitudinal studies. Possible explanations for the apparent decrease shown cross-sectionally are, in addition to the usual assumption of individual changes during aging, the secular trend toward increasing height and selective survival of small persons. In addition to such discrepancies, there are other problems which can be settled only by longitudinal study: changes known to occur with individual aging but with unknown time of onset, rate, and magnitude (e. g., stature and the anteroposterior chest diameter); and contradictory findings of several cross-sectional studies (e. g., skinfold thickness). Longitudinal studies of aging are not merely desirable - they are mandatory.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- CORRELATIONS NORMAL STANDARDS + INTERDEPENDENCE IN TESTS OF VENTILATORY STRENGTH + MECHANICSPublished by Elsevier ,1964
- SKINFOLD DISTRIBUTIONS IN MIDDLE‐AGED AMERICAN MEN: A CONTRIBUTION TO NORMS OF LEANNESS‐FATNESS*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1963
- MAXIMAL EXPIRATORY FLOW TESTS IN A POPULATION SAMPLE, WITH AN APPLICATION OF COMPONENT ANALYSISPublished by Elsevier ,1963
- Predicting somatotype from body measurementsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1962
- The veterans administration-army cooperative study of pulmonary functionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1961
- The thickness of subcutaneous fat in elderly menAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1958
- Pulmonary Function Studies: Age Differences in Lung Volumes and Bellows FunctionJournal of Gerontology, 1956