The influence of context and process when implementing e-health
Open Access
- 30 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 9 (1) , 9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-9-9
Abstract
Investing in computer-based information systems is notoriously risky, since many systems fail to become routinely used as part of everyday working practices, yet there is clear evidence about the management practices which improve the acceptance and integration of such systems. Our aim in this study was to identify to what extent these generic management practices are evident in e-health projects, and to use that knowledge to develop a theoretical model of e-health implementation. This will support the implementation of appropriate e-health systems. This study consisted of qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers and health professionals in Scotland, UK. We contacted the Scottish Ethics Committee, who advised that formal application to that body was not necessary for this study. The interview guide aimed to identify the issues which respondents believed had affected the successful implementation of e-health projects. We drew on our research into information systems in other sectors to identify likely themes and questions, which we piloted and revised. Eighteen respondents with experience of e-health projects agreed to be interviewed. These were recorded, transcribed, coded, and then analysed with 'Nvivo' data analysis software. Respondents identified factors in the context of e-health projects which had affected implementation, including clarity of the strategy; supportive structures and cultures; effects on working processes; and how staff perceived the change. The results also identified useful implementation practices such as balancing planning with adaptability; managing participation; and using power effectively. The interviews confirmed that the contextual factors that affect implementation of information systems in general also affect implementation of e-health projects. As expected, these take place in an evolving context of strategies, structures, cultures, working processes and people. Respondents also confirmed that those managing such projects seek to change these contexts through observable implementation processes of planning, adaptation, participation and using power. This study confirms that research to support the delivery of appropriate e-health projects can usefully draw on the experience of information systems in other sectors.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process modelBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- Local Sociotechnical System Development in the NHS National Programme for Information TechnologyJournal of Information Technology, 2007
- It-Enabled Healthcare Delivery: The U.K. National Health ServiceInformation Systems Management, 2006
- Information systems project abandonment: a stakeholder analysisInternational Journal of Information Management, 2005
- The limited acceptance of an electronic prescription system by general practitioners: reasons and practical implicationsNew Technology, Work and Employment, 2004
- Changing perspectives on the organizational consequences of information technologyBehaviour & Information Technology, 2001
- Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementationEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 1996
- The inertial impact of culture on IT implementationInformation & Management, 1994
- Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1993
- CONTEXT AND ACTION IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE FIRMJournal of Management Studies, 1987