Radiology Reports
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 176 (3) , 591-598
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760591
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The introduction of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) frequently includes the option of computer-generated itemized reports. This motivated us to reassess the merits of traditional prose dictated reports. This study examines radiologist and clinician preferences regarding report style and content.MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study was conducted in two parts. The first part was a retrospective audit of existing medical imaging prose reports to determine their content. The second part comprised a questionnaire containing three mock clinical scenarios. Three pairs of reports were provided for each scenario, with only essential information in the first pair, some optional information in the second, and the most complete report in the third. Each pair consisted of a prose and itemized report with identical content. Participants ranked reports by preference and were asked specific questions regarding report content. The questionnaires were mailed to referring clinicians and administere...Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Radiology reports: how much descriptive detail is enough?American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- The evolution of the X-ray report.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Readability of the Radiologic ReportInvestigative Radiology, 1992
- Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians.Radiology, 1988
- The language of certainty: proper terminology for the ending of the radiologic reportAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1985
- Radiologic reporting: structureAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983