Gastric Fullness, Physical Activity, and Proximal Extent of Gastroesophageal Reflux
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 100 (6) , 1251-1256
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41695.x
Abstract
Proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux (PER) is relevant for symptoms in GERD patients. It has been suggested that PER is determined by the volume of the refluxate that, in turn, might depend on the degree of gastric fullness. Abdominal straining, during ambulation, increases the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux. We assessed the influence of gastric fullness and ambulation on proximal extent of reflux. PER was assessed in 37 patients with GERD undergoing ambulatory pH impedance monitoring. In 14 controls and 19 GERD patients, esophageal pH impedance and gastric emptying were also studied simultaneously in stationary conditions. We compared PER during fasting, early postprandial (before half emptying), and late postprandial periods in ambulatory and stationary conditions. More reflux episodes reached the proximal esophagus in the postprandial period compared to fasting (60%± 4 vs 29%± 3, p < 0.05). In stationary conditions, early postprandial reflux reached higher proximal extent than late postprandial reflux (15 ± 3% vs 8 ± 4%, p < 0.05). The proportion of reflux events reaching the proximal esophagus was significantly higher in ambulatory than in stationary conditions (29 ± 5% vs 15 ± 3%, p < 0.05). Compared to fasting, reflux episodes occurring after the meals are more likely to reach higher proximal extent, particularly so during the early postprandial period. The highest proportion of postprandial proximal reflux occurred in ambulatory condition. These findings suggest that reducing meal volumes and early postprandial physical activity might contribute to decrease proximal extent of reflux and postprandial GERD symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intra‐oesophageal distribution and perception of acid reflux in patients with non‐erosive gastro‐oesophageal reflux diseaseAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2003
- Non-erosive reflux disease: the real problem in gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseDigestive and Liver Disease, 2001
- Nonerosive Reflux Disease— Current Concepts and DilemmasAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2001
- Gastric Response to Increased Meal Viscosity Assessed by Echo-Planar Magnetic Resonance Imaging in HumansJournal of Nutrition, 2000
- Pharyngeal acid Reflux in Patients with Single and Multiple Otolaryngologic DisordersOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1999
- Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitisGastroenterology, 1995
- Symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease is dependent on spatiotemporal reflux characteristicsGastroenterology, 1995
- Dynamic Characteristics of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux in Ambulatory Patients with Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease and Normal Control SubjectsScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1995
- Measurement of gastric emptying by magnetic resonance imaging in humansGastroenterology, 1992
- Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with ‘reflux laryngitis’Gastroenterology, 1991