Radiculopathy and Myelopathy at Segments Adjacent to the Site of a Previous Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis*
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 81 (4) , 519-28
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
Abstract
E.Methods: A consecutive series of 374 patients who had a total of 409 anterior cervical arthrodeses for the treatment of cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy or myelopathy, or both, were followed for a maximum of twenty-one years after the operation. The annual incidence of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease was defined as the percentage of patients who had been disease-free at the start of a given year of follow-up in whom new disease developed during that year. The prevalence was defined as the percentage of all patients in whom symptomatic adjacent-segment disease developed within a given period of follow-up. The natural history of the disease was predicted with use of a Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis. The hypothesis that new disease at an adjacent level is more likely to develop following a multilevel arthrodesis than it is following a single-level arthrodesis was tested with logistic regression.Results: Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease occurred at a relatively constant incidence of 2.9 percent per year (range, 0.0 to 4.8 percent per year) during the ten years after the operation. Survivorship analysis predicted that 25.6 percent of the patients (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 32 percent) who had an anterior cervical arthrodesis would have new disease at an adjacent level within ten years after the operation. There were highly significant differences among the motion segments with regard to the likelihood of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (p < 0.0001); the greatest risk was at the interspaces between the fifth and sixth and between the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that the risk of new disease at an adjacent level was significantly lower following a multilevel arthrodesis than it was following a single-level arthrodesis (p < 0.001). More than two-thirds of all patients in whom the new disease developed had failure of nonoperative management and needed additional operative procedures.Conclusions: Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease may affect more than one-fourth of all patients within ten years after an anterior cervical arthrodesis. A single-level arthrodesis involving the fifth or sixth cervical vertebra and preexisting radiographic evidence of degeneration at adjacent levels appear to be the greatest risk factors for new disease. Therefore, we believe that all degenerated segments causing radiculopathy or myelopathy should be included in an anterior cervical arthrodesis. Although our findings suggest that symptomatic adjacent-segment disease is the result of progressive spondylosis, patients should be informed of the substantial possibility that new disease will develop at an adjacent level over the long term....Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Short Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Biomechanics of Neighboring Unfused SegmentsSpine, 1996
- The Natural History of Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Clinical, Roentgenographic, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings at AdulthoodJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1995
- Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Adjacent Segment Motion After Lumbar FusionSpine, 1994
- Late Radiographic Findings After Anterior Cervical Fusion for Spondylotic MyeloradiculopathySpine, 1993
- Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
- Modified Smith-Robinson Procedure for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and FusionSpine, 1992
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy and FusionSpine, 1990
- Instability of the cervical spine after anterior interbody fusionArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 1985
- Anterior Cervical Fusion for Degenerated or Protruded DiscsSpine, 1984
- A possible genetic factor in cervical spondylosisThe British Journal of Radiology, 1969