A National and Single Institutional Experience in the Contemporary Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 238 (3) , 382-390
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086663.49670.d1
Abstract
Objective To determine the contemporary clinical relevance of acute lower extremity ischemia and the factors associated with amputation and in-hospital mortality. Summary Background Data Acute lower extremity ischemia is considered limb- and life-threatening and usually requires therapy within 24 hours. The equivalency of thrombolytic therapy and surgery for the treatment of subacute limb ischemia up to 14 days duration is accepted fact. However, little information exists with regards to the long-term clinical course and therapeutic outcomes in these patients. Methods Two databases formed the basis for this study. The first was the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1992 to 2000 of all patients (N = 23,268) with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute embolism and thrombosis of the lower extremities. The second was a retrospective University of Michigan experience from 1995 to 2002 of matched ICD-9-CM coded patients (N = 105). Demographic factors, atherosclerotic risk factors, the need for amputation, and in-hospital mortality were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results In the NIS, the mean patient age was 71 years, and 54% were female. The average length of stay (LOS) was 9.4 days, and inflation-adjusted cost per admission was $25,916. The amputation rate was 12.7%, and mortality was 9%. Decreased amputation rates accompanied: female sex (0.90, 0.81–0.99), age less than 63 years (0.47, 0.41–0.54), angioplasty (0.46, 0.38–0.55), and embolectomy (0.39, 0.35–0.44). Decreased mortality accompanied: angioplasty (0.79, 0.64–0.96), heparin administration (0.50, 0.29–0.86), and age less than 63 years(0.27, 0.23–0.33). The University of Michigan patients’ mean age was 62 years, and 57% were men. The LOS was 11 days, with a 14% amputation rate and a mortality of 12%. Prior vascular bypasses existed in 23% of patients, and heparin use was documented in 16%. Embolectomy was associated with decreased amputation rates (0.054, 0.01–0.27) and mortality (0.07, 0.01–0.57). Conclusions In patients with acute limb ischemia, the more widespread use of heparin anticoagulation and, in select patients, performance of embolectomy rather than pursuing thrombolysis may improve patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heparin’s anti-inflammatory effects require glucosamine 6-O-sulfation and are mediated by blockade of L- and P-selectinsJournal of Clinical Investigation, 2002
- Identification of In-Hospital Complications From Claims DataMedical Care, 2000
- A Systematic Review of Intra-arterial Thrombolytic Therapy for Lower-limb IschaemiaEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2000
- A Comparison of Recombinant Urokinase with Vascular Surgery as Initial Treatment for Acute Arterial Occlusion of the LegsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Management of acute leg ischaemia in the elderlyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Acute leg ischaemia in GloucestershireBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemiaEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1996
- Surgical revascularization versus thrombolysis for nonembolic lower extremity native artery occlusions: Results of a prospective randomized trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: Phase I resultsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating Surgery Versus Thrombolysis for Ischemia of the Lower Extremity The STILE TrialAnnals of Surgery, 1994