First-Trimester or Second-Trimester Screening, or Both, for Down's Syndrome
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 10 November 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 353 (19) , 2001-2011
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa043693
Abstract
It is uncertain how best to screen pregnant women for the presence of fetal Down's syndrome: to perform first-trimester screening, to perform second-trimester screening, or to use strategies incorporating measurements in both trimesters.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- First-Trimester Septated Cystic HygromaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Contingent screening for Down syndrome is an efficient alternative to non‐disclosure sequential screeningPrenatal Diagnosis, 2004
- Nuchal translucency and gestational agePrenatal Diagnosis, 2004
- First-Trimester Sonographic Screening for Down Syndrome*1Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2003
- First-Trimester Screening for Trisomies 21 and 18New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Tests using multiple markersPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2000
- Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome Based on Tests Performed during the First and Second TrimestersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestationThe Lancet, 1998
- Combining Ultrasound and Biochemistry in First-Trimester Screening for Down's syndromePrenatal Diagnosis, 1997
- Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy.BMJ, 1992