Three Methods of Developing MMPI Taxonomies of Sexual Offenders
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment
- Vol. 56 (1) , 2-13
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5601_1
Abstract
In a sample of 261 state hospital sexual offenders, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) profiles did not differ for offenders with adult victims versus offenders with child victims when offender age was controlled. MMPI 2-point analyses for the whole sample revealed five common codes that were independent of victim maturity. The sample was randomly divided in half and subjected to a cluster-analytic procedure which revealed two MMPI clusters. The first cluster was unelevated, with Scale 4 as its high point. The second cluster had multiple elevations, with Scales 8, 4, 2, and 7 as the highest scales. These clusters were replicated in a cluster analysis of the second half of the sample. However, when the sample was recombined, the two clusters were not externally validated basis on demographic and criminological variables. The results suggest that common psychological variables among sexual offenders may have more discriminative value than victim maturity in developing sexual offender taxonomies.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A descriptive study of rapists and child molesters: Developmental, clinical, and criminal characteristicsBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1987
- MMPI profile constellations in incest families.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1986
- Cluster AnalysisPublished by SAGE Publications ,1984