National obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK 1997/1998
Open Access
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 55 (12) , 1168-1172
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01720.x
Abstract
In the United Kingdom, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists requires maternity units recognised for training to complete annual statistical returns. Analysis of these data revealed that anaesthetists were directly involved in more than 251 000 procedures in the peripartum period in 1997/1998. There had been an increase in the number of women delivered by Caesarean section (18.5% of all deliveries) compared with previous reports. The proportion of Caesarean sections performed under regional anaesthesia had increased for both elective and emergency Caesarean section deliveries (85.5% and 70.2%, respectively). For pain relief in labour, there had been neither an increase nor a decrease in the uptake of regional analgesia (23.6%). There were limited training opportunities for anaesthetists in general anaesthesia for Caesarean section and for obstetricians in vaginal breech delivery. The known admissions to intensive care units equated to over 100 women per month in the United Kingdom requiring intensive care as a result of childbirth.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Training in obstetric general anaesthesia: a vanishing art?Anaesthesia, 2000
- Definitions in obstetric anaesthesia: how should we measure anaesthetic workload and what is ‘epidural rate’?Anaesthesia, 1999
- A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United KingdomAnaesthesia, 1999
- Obstetric admissions to an intensive therapy unitInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1996
- Critically ill parturient women and admission to intensive care: a 5-year reviewInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1996
- Epidural versus general anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section Effect on Apgar score and acid‐base status of the newbornAnaesthesia, 1989
- The requirement for intensive care support for the pregnant populationAnaesthesia, 1989
- EPIDURAL ANALGESIA VS. GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN SECTIONActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1988
- ANAESTHETIC MORBIDITY FOLLOWING CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER EPIDURAL OR GENERAL ANAESTHESIAThe Lancet, 1984