An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High‐Stakes Decisions
- 25 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Vol. 4 (4) , 305-328
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0404_01
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- An Alternative Metaphor in the Study of Judgment and Choice: People as PoliticiansTheory & Psychology, 1991
- Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?JAMA, 1984
- Choice Strategy in a Difficult Task EnvironmentJournal of Consumer Research, 1982
- Impact of patient preferences on the selection of therapyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: A replication and extensionOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibilityOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- Assessment of Attribute Importances and Consumer Utility Functions: Von Neumann-Morgenstern Theory Applied to Consumer BehaviorJournal of Consumer Research, 1979
- Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976
- Intransitivity of preferences.Psychological Review, 1969