Three methods to construct predictive models using logistic regression and likelihood ratios to facilitate adjustment for pretest probability give similar results
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (1) , 52-63
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratiosBMJ, 2004
- Test Research versus Diagnostic ResearchClinical Chemistry, 2004
- Accuracy of history, wheezing, and forced expiratory time in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2002
- Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticiansStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- The Accuracy of Patient History, Wheezing, and Laryngeal Measurements in Diagnosing Obstructive Airway DiseaseJAMA, 2000
- Why we need large, simple studies of the clinical examination: the problem and a proposed solutionThe Lancet, 1999
- Probabilistic analysis of global performances of diagnostic tests: interpreting the Lorenz curve-based summary measuresStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standardsJAMA, 1997
- Application of Logistic Regression to the Analysis of Diagnostic DataMedical Decision Making, 1992
- Statistical and Knowledge-Based Approaches to Clinical Decision-Support Systems, with an Application in GastroenterologyJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1984