Cysteine 2.59(89) in the Second Transmembrane Domain of Human CB2 Receptor Is Accessible within the Ligand Binding Crevice: Evidence for Possible CB2 Deviation from a Rhodopsin Template
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Pharmacology
- Vol. 68 (1) , 69-83
- https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.007823
Abstract
In this study, the sensitivity of the CB2 receptor to methanethiosulfonate (MTS) derivatives was tested, and a native cysteine residue conferring the sensitivity was identified. By incubating human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably transfected with CB2 receptors and MTS derivatives such as MTS ethylammonium (MTSEA), [3H]HU-243 binding was inhibited. Pretreatment of the CB2 receptor with cannabinoid ligands prevented this inhibition, suggesting that MTSEA modification occurred within the binding crevice. To identify the cysteine(s) responsible for the MTSEA sensitivity, 10 CB2 mutants were prepared in which the eight cysteines in transmembrane domains or extracellular loop 2 were mutated to serine or alanine, one at a time or in combination. Five mutants exhibited specific [3H]HU-243 binding, with Kd and Bmax values similar to those of wild-type CB2. However, five other mutants had no detectable ligand binding and were not detected on cell membranes by Western blot analysis. Among the five mutants with normal binding, only the sensitivity to MTSEA of the C2.59(89)S mutant was reduced significantly. These data demonstrate that C2.59(89) is the residue that mainly confers the inhibitory effect of MTSEA on ligand binding. Furthermore, the magnitude of the second-order rate constant (1.14 ± 0.28 M–1s–1) for the MTSEA reaction with wild-type CB2 suggests that C2.59(89) resides at the margin of the CB2 binding site crevice. The accessibility of C2.59(89) to MTSEA provides experimental evidence for a possible conformational difference between TMH2 of CB2 versus Rho. Modeling studies undertaken to explore the origin of such differences suggest it is possibly caused by the conformational influence of S2.54(84).This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Agonist alkyl tail interaction with cannabinoid CB1 receptor V6.43/I6.46 groove induces a helix 6 active conformationInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 2002
- Activation of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Involves Disruption of an Ionic Lock between the Cytoplasmic Ends of Transmembrane Segments 3 and 6Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
- Structural Mimicry in G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Implications of the High-Resolution Structure of Rhodopsin for Structure-Function Analysis of Rhodopsin-Like ReceptorsMolecular Pharmacology, 2001
- Serine and Threonine Residues Bend α-Helices in the χ1=g− ConformationBiophysical Journal, 2000
- Mutational analysis and molecular modelling of the antagonist SR 144528 binding site on the human cannabinoid CB2 receptorEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 2000
- Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of RhodopsinScience, 1996
- Construction of a 3D model of the cannabinoid cb1 receptor: Determination of helix ends and helix orientationLife Sciences, 1995
- [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptorsPublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Calculating receptor number from binding experiments using same compound as radioligand and competitorTrends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1989
- Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reactionBiochemical Pharmacology, 1973