The Judicialization of Politics in Israel
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Political Science Review
- Vol. 15 (2) , 177-186
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219401500209
Abstract
The judicialization of politics has probably proceeded further in Israel than in any other democratic country. In the strong sense of the definition propounded by Torbjörn Vallinder (1992: 1), the civil judiciary in Israel, particularly the Supreme Court justices sitting as members of the High Court of Justice, are exercising power at the expense of politi cians and administrators. The justices now claim the authority even to review the internal workings of the theoretically sovereign Knesset (parlia ment). This situation represents a marked change from the norms of 46 years ago when the state came into existence. Then, power and authority were concentrated in the elected agencies, the Knesset and, particularly, the Government. Rampant partisanship, arbitrary and self-interested policies, and, worst of all, an inability to deal with crucial problems beset ting Israeli society, corroded that authority and, ultimately, the power of the elected leadership. The default of Israel's democratically elected leadership has led to the judicialization of politics.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Judicial Elite of IsraelInternational Political Science Review, 1992
- The Founding Of Israeli Democracy, 1948-1967Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1990
- Judicial DiscretionPublished by JSTOR ,1989
- Constitutional Adjudication without a Constitution: The Case of IsraelHarvard Law Review, 1969
- Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional LawHarvard Law Review, 1959
- The Role of Parties in Israeli DemocracyThe Journal of Politics, 1955