Industrialisation in the Global Periphery: The Significance of the Newly Industrialising Countries of East and Southeast Asia
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Vol. 4 (4) , 401-418
- https://doi.org/10.1068/d040401
Abstract
Despite the benefits of ex post facto reasoning, what remains in dispute is the interpretation of the factors responsible for the emergence of the newly industrialising countries (NICs) of East and Southeast Asia. Here it is argued that the dominant perspective, that deriving from neoclassical economics, is both defective and misrepresentative. In an attempt to overcome these inadequacies recourse is made to radical political economy perspectives to understand better the significance of industrialisation in the NICs.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- The newly industrializing countries and radical theories of developmentWorld Development, 1985
- Adjustment policies in developing countries: A reassessmentWorld Development, 1984
- Beyond export-led growthWorld Development, 1984
- Is there cause for export optimism? An inquiry into the existence of a second generation of successful exportersReview of World Economics, 1982
- Can the East Asian model of development be generalized?World Development, 1982
- Export incentives and export performance in developing countries: A comparative analysisReview of World Economics, 1978
- Equity with growth in Taiwan: How ‘special’ is the ‘special case’?World Development, 1978
- Economic growth and equity in the Republic of KoreaWorld Development, 1978
- The republic of Korea's experience with export-led industrial developmentWorld Development, 1978
- Industrial policies in Taiwan and KoreaReview of World Economics, 1971