Relative hazard of weapons impulses
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 73 (2) , 556-566
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389001
Abstract
Arguments in favor of a theoretically based damage-risk criterion (DRC) for intense noise were developed to make a crucial prediction. Based on measured spectral differences, it was predicted that rifle impulses would cause permanent threshold shifts at .apprx. 9 dB lower peak pressures than cannon impulses. DRC in use in the world predicted that the cannon would be more hazardous than the rifle by 7-10 dB. Electrophysiological measures of sensitivity were used in 38 cats (76 ears) which were exposed to 60 impulses, .apprx. 3 s apart, at various peak pressures, from a rifle or a 105 mm Howitzer. Hearing changes were followed until recovery was complete (2 mo.). Permanent threshold shifts began at .apprx. 140 dB for rifle impulses and 150-155 dB for cannon impulses, confirming the prediction and supporting the contention that there was a spectrally dependent critical level for the ear at high intensities. Implications for present DRC and future risk assessment schemes were discussed.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implications of a critical level in the ear for assessment of noise hazard at high intensitiesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981
- Loss of auditory sensitivity following exposure to spectrally narrow impulsesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979
- Action potentials in the cat at low sound intensities: Thresholds, latencies, and rates of changeThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- Middle-Ear Characteristics of Anesthetized CatsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967
- Reliability of TTS from Impulse-Noise ExposureThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966