A study of perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection
- 1 July 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 63 (7) , 555-558
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800630714
Abstract
A comparative study of 53 cases has revealed that a technique of complete primary closure of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and anal canal appears to be a superior, more rational approach than other orthodox techniques, (It is unsuitable for any case contaminated with pus or faeces during operation.) Redivac apparatus used through a separate route for continuous drainage from the sacral cavity has made the postoperative care easier for nurses and surgeons and this period more comfortable for the patient. It provides a simple method compared with other suction apparatus used for the same purpose. Of the 53 cases, 12 were operated on using a traditional technique involving the closure of the perineal wound around a tube drain connected to an underwater seal, while in the remaining 41 the approach described here was used. Primary healing of the perineal wound with the latter approach was obtained in about 88 percent, With the other technique the figures were 34 and 66 per cent respectively for early healing within 3 weeks and delayed healing between 3–8 weeks. Primary healing of the perineal wound reduces the total stay in hospital and the morbidity.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- The Perineal Wound after Excision of the RectumPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1960
- A METHOD OF PERFORMING ABDOMINO-PERINEAL EXCISION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM AND OF THE TERMINAL PORTION OF THE PELVIC COLON.The Lancet, 1908