The Number of Guttman Errors as a Simple and Powerful Person-Fit Statistic
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 18 (4) , 311-314
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169401800402
Abstract
A number of studies have examined the power of several statistics that can be used to detect examinees with unexpected (nonfitting) item score patterns, or to determine person fit. This study compared the power of the U3 statistic with the power of one of the sim plest person-fit statistics, the sum of the number of Guttman errors. In most cases studied, (a weighted version of) the latter statistic performed as well as the U3 statistic. Counting the number of Guttman errors seems to be a useful and simple alternative to more complex statistics for determining person fit. Index terms: aberrance detection, appropriateness measure ment, Guttman errors, nonparametric item response theory, person fit.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of Aberrant Item Score Patterns: A Review of Recent DevelopmentsApplied Measurement in Education, 1995
- Influence of Test and Person Characteristics on Nonparametric Appropriateness MeasurementApplied Psychological Measurement, 1994
- The Many Null Distributions of Person Fit IndicesPsychometrika, 1990
- Detecting Inappropriate Test Scores with Optimal and Practical Appropriateness IndicesApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- TIME ALLOCATION AND PATTERNS OF ITEM RESPONSEJournal of Educational Measurement, 1986
- Caution Indices based on Item Response TheoryPsychometrika, 1984
- Deviant Response Patterns and Comparability of Test ScoresJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1982
- ANALYSIS OF ITEM RESPONSE PATTERNS. QUESTIONABLE TEST DATA AND DISSIMILAR CURRICULUM PRACTICESJournal of Educational Measurement, 1981
- Measuring the Appropriateness of Multiple-Choice Test ScoresJournal of Educational Statistics, 1979