Direct Effects of Base Money on Aggregate Demand: Theory and Evidence
Preprint
- 1 January 2000
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Meltzer (1999a) shows that real monetary base growth is a significant determinant of consumption growth in the United States, controlling for the short-term real interest rate. In this paper, I show that the same property of base money holds for total output (relative to trend or potential) in both the United States and the United Kingdom. The standard optimising IS-LM model cannot account for this result, but I show that it can once the long-term nominal interest rate is included in the money demand function. Because the long-term real rate matters for aggregate demand, the presence of the long-term nominal rate in the money demand function increases the effect of nominal money stock changes on real aggregate demand when prices are sticky.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Monetary History of the United Kingdom, 1870-1982Published by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- UK monetary policy, 1972-97: a guide using Taylor rulesPublished by Edward Elgar Publishing ,2003
- THE REAL-INTEREST-RATE GAP AS AN INFLATION INDICATORMacroeconomic Dynamics, 2003
- An Optimizing IS-LM Framework with Endogenous InvestmentPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- Monetary Policy and Asset Price VolatilityPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- The Domestic Adjusted Monetary BasePublished by Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ,2000
- Taylor Rules in a Limited Participation ModelPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1999
- Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing frameworkJournal of Monetary Economics, 1983
- Time deposits in the Brunner-Meltzer model of asset marketsJournal of Monetary Economics, 1981
- Economic Progress in a Stable EnvironmentEconomica, 1947