Population biology of the chestnut blight fungus,Cryphonectria parasitica
- 31 December 1995
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Botany
- Vol. 73 (S1) , 311-319
- https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-261
Abstract
Interest in the population biology of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica has been motivated largely by the potential for biological control of chestnut blight with fungal viruses that cause hypovirulence. Earlier studies gave valuable insights into the correlation between diversity of vegetative compatibility groups and transmission of hypovirulence viruses. However, inferences about evolutionary processes affecting populations were not possible because vegetative compatibility groups are not genetically defined. Using restriction fragment length polymorphism markers, however, progress has been made in studying the origin of C. parasitica in North America, gene flow among populations, dispersal within populations, and recombination and the mating system. Cryphonectria parasitica populations in North America are genetically more similar to populations in Japan than in China, which is consistent with previous speculations that this fungus was introduced from Japan. Populations in China and Japan are quite different, suggesting little or no gene flow between these areas. Restricted gene flow and genetic drift are probably the dominant evolutionary forces shaping North American populations, with approximately 20% of gene diversity due to differences among populations (GST = 0.20). Two populations of C. parasitica in Michigan and one population in Italy are primarily clonal in structure. In contrast, sexual reproduction appears to be common in populations in eastern North America, although most of these populations deviate significantly from random mating. Deviations from random mating are most likely due to self-fertilization (uniparental inbreeding), restricted dispersal of male gametes, and mating between individuals that are more closely related genetically than would be expected by chance (biparental inbreeding). Aggregations of similar genotypes in space suggest that populations of C. parasitica may be structured into genetic neighborhoods by restricted dispersal. Future research efforts in this system will explore isolation by distance and address questions of hypovirulence virus coevolution with its fungal host. Key words: Cryphonectria parasitica, Endothia parasitica, chestnut blight, genetic neighbourhoods, inbreeding.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CHESTNUT BLIGHT IN EUROPEAnnual Review of Phytopathology, 1994
- Diversity ofCryphonectria parasiticaHypovirulence-Associated Double-Stranded RNAs within a Chestnut Population in New JerseyPhytopathology®, 1994
- Rapid changes in genetic structure of epidemic populations of Ophiostoma ulmiNature, 1988
- Population Dynamics ofCryphonectria parasiticain a Mixed-Hardwood Forest in ConnecticutPhytopathology®, 1987
- Lack of Sequence Homology between Double-stranded RNA from European and American Hypovirulent Strains of Endothia parasiticaJournal of General Virology, 1985
- Dissemination of Virulent and Hypovirulent Forms of a Marked Strain ofEndothia parasiticain MichiganPhytopathology®, 1985
- Vegetative Compatibility and Hypovirulence Conversion Among Naturally Occurring Isolates ofCryphonectria parasiticaPhytopathology®, 1984
- Chestnut blight and recovering American chestnut trees in MichiganCanadian Journal of Botany, 1983
- Hypovirulence, Vegetative Incompatibility, and the Growth of Cankers of Chestnut BlightPhytopathology®, 1981
- Hypovirulence Conversion inEndothia parasiticaPhytopathology®, 1979