Electoral Realignments
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Political Science
- Vol. 3 (1) , 449-474
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.449
Abstract
American electoral realignment theory, as constructed in its classic form chiefly by Key, Schattschneider, Sundquist, and Burnham, can be sorted into 11 distinct empirical claims. These pertain to dichotomization of election types, periodicity, a cyclical dynamic, high voter turnout, durable new issue cleavages, ideologized elections, nationalization of issues, major changes in government policy, redistributive policy, effective and consequential voter voice, and the “system of 1896.” These claims are assessed for their empirical validity and illuminative power.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bring Back the WPA: Work, Relief, and the Origins of American Social Policy in Welfare ReformStudies in American Political Development, 1998
- The Concept of a Critical Realignment, Electoral Behavior, and Political ChangeAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Taxation and the political economy of the tariffInternational Organization, 1990
- Periodization Schemes and "Party Systems": The "System of 1896" as a Case in PointSocial Science History, 1986
- Persistence of Party Success in American Presidential ElectionsJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1985
- Why is there no Socialism in the United States?History Workshop Journal, 1984
- The Changing Shape of the American Political UniverseAmerican Political Science Review, 1965
- The Causes of the Great Depression, 1873-96The Manchester School, 1961
- Secular Realignment and the Party SystemThe Journal of Politics, 1959
- A Theory of Critical ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 1955