Clinical Trials and Industry
- 27 September 2002
- journal article
- policy forum
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 297 (5590) , 2211
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074543
Abstract
Several disputes between clinical researchers and pharmaceutical manufacturers have highlighted the critical importance of protecting the right of trial subjects to disclosure of risks and the academic freedom of investigators. In this Policy Forum, some lessons from an inquiry into the case involving Dr. Nancy Olivieri, Apotex Inc., the Hospital for Sick Children, and the University of Toronto are outlined. Given that pharmaceutical companies are more powerful than individual researchers, it is essential that institutions live up to their responsibilities to protect the public interest by ensuring they have robust policies and practices in place governing disclosure of risks and academic independence.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protecting Research Subjects — What Must Be DoneNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- No dismissal for hate-mail authorNature Medicine, 2000
- Uneasy Alliance — Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical IndustryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Academia and industry: lessons from the unfortunate events in TorontoThe Lancet, 1999
- Secrecy Dispute Pits Brown Researcher Against CompanyScience, 1997
- Thyroid StormPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997