A Hybrid Micro–Macroevolutionary Approach to Gene Tree Reconstruction
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Computational Biology
- Vol. 13 (2) , 320-335
- https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2006.13.320
Abstract
Gene family evolution is determined by microevolutionary processes (e.g., point mutations) and macroevolutionary processes (e.g., gene duplication and loss), yet macroevolutionary considerations are rarely incorporated into gene phylogeny reconstruction methods. We present a dynamic program to find the most parsimonious gene family tree with respect to a macroevolutionary optimization criterion, the weighted sum of the number of gene duplications and losses. The existence of a polynomial delay algorithm for duplication/loss phylogeny reconstruction stands in contrast to most formulations of phylogeny reconstruction, which are NP-complete. We next extend this result to obtain a two-phase method for gene tree reconstruction that takes both micro- and macroevolution into account. In the first phase, a gene tree is constructed from sequence data, using any of the previously known algorithms for gene phylogeny construction. In the second phase, the tree is refined by rearranging regions of the tree that do not have strong support in the sequence data to minimize the duplication/lost cost. Components of the tree with strong support are left intact. This hybrid approach incorporates both micro- and macroevolutionary considerations, yet its computational requirements are modest in practice because the two-phase approach constrains the search space. Our hybrid algorithm can also be used to resolve nonbinary nodes in a multifurcating gene tree. We have implemented these algorithms in a software tool, NOTUNG 2.0, that can be used as a unified framework for gene tree reconstruction or as an exploratory analysis tool that can be applied post hoc to any rooted tree with bootstrap values. The NOTUNG 2.0 graphical user interface can be used to visualize alternate duplication/loss histories, root trees according to duplication and loss parsimony, manipulate and annotate gene trees, and estimate gene duplication times. It also offers a command line option that enables high-throughput analysis of a large number of trees.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tree pattern matching in phylogenetic trees: automatic search for orthologs or paralogs in homologous gene sequence databasesBioinformatics, 2005
- Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMCBioinformatics, 2003
- NOTUNG: A Program for Dating Gene Duplications and Optimizing Gene Family TreesJournal of Computational Biology, 2000
- Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1998
- Duplication-Based Measures of Difference Between Gene and Species TreesJournal of Computational Biology, 1998
- Comparison of annotating duplication, tree mapping, and copying as methods to compare gene trees with species treesPublished by American Mathematical Society (AMS) ,1997
- Reconstruction of Ancient Molecular PhylogenyMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996
- The computational complexity of inferring rooted phylogenies by parsimonyMathematical Biosciences, 1986
- A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-ValidationThe American Statistician, 1983
- Fitting the Gene Lineage into its Species Lineage, a Parsimony Strategy Illustrated by Cladograms Constructed from Globin SequencesSystematic Zoology, 1979