PLANNING AND REVISING THE SAMPLE SIZE FOR A TRIAL
- 15 May 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 14 (9) , 1039-1051
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140922
Abstract
The sample size for a trial depends on the type I and type II error rates and on the minimum relevant clinical difference, all of which are known, and on the anticipated, but unknown, value of a measure of variation for the key response. This measure is the overall response rate when the key response is binomially distributed, or the residual variance in each treatment group when the key response is continuous and normally distributed. Since the true value of the measure is unknown, it must be guessed or estimated from previous trials. We describe approaches to determining an appropriate value for it, both before the trial begins and after it has begun, for use in calculating the final sample size. These approaches differ from previously described ‘internal pilot’ methods in not requiring unblinding of the treatment assignments in the trial. They preserve the power and do not affect the type I error rate materially. The approaches can be applied to longitudinal studies where the rate of change over time is the response of interest, and to group sequential trials.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample sizes for event rate equivalence trials using prior informationStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Interim analyses for monitoring clinical trials that do not materially affect the type I error rateStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Sample size re-estimation without unblinding for normally distributed outcomes with unknown varianceCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1992
- The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Bayesian Risk Ratio AnalysisThe American Statistician, 1981
- Some Methods for Studying the Mixture of Two Normal (Lognormal) DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979
- Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM AlgorithmJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1977
- Inference and missing dataBiometrika, 1976
- CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR POWER, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MEDICAL TRIALS*Australian Journal of Statistics, 1972
- A Two-Sample Test for a Linear Hypothesis Whose Power is Independent of the VarianceThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1945