Analyzing a Portion of the ROC Curve
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 9 (3) , 190-195
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8900900307
Abstract
The area under the ROC curve is a common index summarizing the information contained in the curve. When comparing two ROC curves, though, problems arise when interest does not lie in the entire range of false-positive rates (and hence the entire area). Numerical integration is suggested for evaluating the area under a portion of the ROC curve. Variance estimates are derived. The method is applicable for either continuous or rating scale binormal data, from independent or dependent samples. An example is presented which looks at rating scale data of computed tomographic scans of the head with and without concomitant use of clinical history. The areas under the two ROC curves over an a priori range of false- positive rates are examined, as well as the areas under the two curves at a specific point.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC CurvesMedical Decision Making, 1988
- Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Statistical Approaches to the Analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) CurvesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated DataPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- USE OF RELATIVE OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS IN EPIDEMIOLOGYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1981
- Assessment of Diagnostic TechnologiesScience, 1979
- ROC Analysis Applied to the Evaluation of Medical Imaging TechniquesInvestigative Radiology, 1979
- What is the best index of detectability?Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method dataJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1969