Economic Distress and Intimate Violence: Testing Family Stress and Resources Theories
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Marriage and Family
- Vol. 64 (3) , 793-807
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00793.x
Abstract
Hypotheses shaped by family stress and resource theories about the impact of household economic indicators on the risk of violence against women in intimate relationships are tested with a data set built from the initial two waves of the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH) and the 1990 U.S. Census. Measures of employment status, job conditions, and economic well‐being for male and female partners are examined with logistic regression analyses as predictors of the odds of male‐to‐female intimate violence. Results underline the importance that partners attach to each other's work performance and their feelings of financial well‐being in assessing whether job holding and household income serve to elevate or reduce the risk of intimate partner violence toward women.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Violence between Spouses and Intimates: Does Neighborhood Context Matter?Social Forces, 1998
- Violence between Spouses and Intimates: Does Neighborhood Context Matter?Social Forces, 1998
- Sources of Economic DistressJournal of Family Issues, 1998
- SOCIOECONOMIC AND COERCIVE POWER WITHIN THE FAMILYGender & Society, 1996
- Comparing One-Partner and Couple Data on Sensitive Marital Behaviors: The Case of Marital ViolenceJournal of Marriage and Family, 1995
- Sampling Weights and Regression AnalysisSociological Methods & Research, 1994
- The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies"American Journal of Sociology, 1989
- Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhood on the Fertility of Black AdolescentsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- Using Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Analyses of Stratified SamplesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983