Variation in pollinator effectiveness in swamp milkweed, Asclepias incarnata (Apocynaceae)
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 90 (2) , 214-225
- https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.2.214
Abstract
The contribution of a pollinator toward plant fitness (i.e., its “effectiveness”) can determine its importance for the plant's evolutionary ecology. We compared pollinators in a population of Asclepias incarnata (Apocynaceae) for several components of pollinator effectiveness over two flowering seasons to evaluate their importance to plant reproduction. Insects of the order Hymenoptera predominate in A. incarnata pollination, but there appears to be no specialization for pollination within this order. Pollinators varied significantly in nearly every component of effectiveness that we measured, including pollen load, removal and deposition of pollen, pollination efficiency (deposition/removal), flower‐handling time, and potential for geitonogamy (fractional pollen deposition). The visitation rate of pollinators also varied significantly between years and through time within years. Pollination success and percentage fruit‐set of unmanipulated plants in the population also varied significantly between years, and pollination success varied among sample times within years. Most components of effectiveness were weakly correlated, suggesting that the contributions of visitor species toward pollination varied among effectiveness components. Mean flower‐handling time, however, was strongly correlated with several components, including pollen removal and deposition, pollination efficiency, and fractional pollen deposition. These findings highlight the significance of pollination variability for plant reproduction and suggest that time‐dependent foraging behaviors may play an important role in determining pollinator effectiveness.Keywords
Funding Information
- Sigma Xi
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pollinator abundance and behavior on Aconitum lycoctonum (Ranunculaceae): an analysis of the quantity and quality components of pollinationOikos, 2000
- The influence of nectar and pollen availability on pollen transfer by individual flowers of oil‐seed rape (Brassica napus) when pollinated by bumblebees (Bombus lapidarius)Journal of Ecology, 1999
- The Co-Radiations of Pollinating Insects and Angiosperms in the CretaceousAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1999
- A trade-off between the frequency and duration of bumblebee visits to flowersOecologia, 1998
- Pollination systems in the Asclepiadaceae: a survey and preliminary analysisBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1997
- Selection for pollination success and the mechanical fit of Impatiens flowers around bumblebee bodiesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1995
- Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfingTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1993
- Pollination efficiency and effectiveness or bumble bees and hummingbirds visiting Delphinium nelsoniiCollectanea Botanica, 1990
- Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard ConditionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Flower-visitors, nectar production, and inflorescence size of Asclepias syriacaCanadian Journal of Botany, 1979