A Study of Amplicor Human Papillomavirus DNA Detection in the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance–Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study
Open Access
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 18 (5) , 1341-1349
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-1180
Abstract
We analyzed the performance of Amplicor for detecting carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and cervical precancer in women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) Pap and compared the results with Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) in the ASCUS and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) triage study (ALTS). Baseline specimens collected from women referred into ALTS based on an ASCUS Pap result were prospectively tested by hc2 and retrospectively tested by Amplicor (n = 3,277). Following receiver-operator-characteristics curve analysis, Amplicor performance was analyzed at three cutoffs (0.2, 1.0, and 1.5). Paired Amplicor and hc2 results were compared for the detection of 2-year cumulative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 and more severe disease outcomes (CIN3+) and for the detection of 13 targeted carcinogenic HPV types. Amplicor at the 0.2 cutoff had a higher sensitivity for the detection of CIN3+ (95.8% versus 92.6%, P = 0.01) but a much lower specificity (38.9% versus 50.6%, P < 0.001) than hc2. Amplicor at the 1.5 cutoff had an identical sensitivity for the detection of CIN3+ (92.6%) and a slightly lower specificity (47.5%; P < 0.001). The positive predictive value of hc2 was higher at all Amplicor cutoffs, whereas referral rates were significantly lower (53.2% for hc2 versus 64.1% at the 0.2 cutoff and 56.0% at the 1.5 cutoff, P < 0.001). Amplicor was more analytically specific for detecting targeted carcinogenic HPV types than hc2. Amplicor at the 1.5 cutoff had comparable performance with hc2. Whereas Amplicor missed more disease related to nontargeted types, hc2 was more likely to miss disease related to targeted types. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(5):1341–9)Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and IndiaInternational Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening With Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing and HPV-16,18 VaccinationJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Human Papillomavirus and Papanicolaou Tests to Screen for Cervical CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trialThe Lancet, 2007
- Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 Assay and Roche AMPLICOR and LINEAR ARRAY Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Tests in Detecting High-Risk HPV Genotypes in Specimens from Women with Previous Abnormal Pap Smear ResultsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical lesions: A meta‐analysis updateInternational Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Agreement between the AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay in Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus and Diagnosis of Biopsy-Confirmed High-Grade Cervical DiseaseJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Chapter 9: Clinical applications of HPV testing: A summary of meta-analysesVaccine, 2006
- Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screeningInternational Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006