Donor Health Assessment After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 236 (1) , 120-126
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200207000-00018
Abstract
To elicit donor opinions on liver living donation through use of a survey that protected the anonymity of the respondent and to assay long-term (follow-up > 1 year) donor health by a widely recognized instrument for health assessment. Living-donor liver transplantation is an accepted technique for children that has recently been extended to adults. Limited donor outcomes data suggest favorable results, but no outcomes data have been reported using an instrument that elicits an anonymous response from the donor or employs a widely recognized health survey. Forty-one living-donors between June 1992 and June 1999 were identified and included in this study, regardless of specific donor or recipient outcome. Each donor received a 68-question survey and a standard McMaster Health Index. Survey response was 80%. All donors were satisfied with the information provided to them before donation. Eighty-eight percent of donors initially learned of living donation only after their child had been diagnosed with liver disease: 44% through the transplant center, 40% by popular media, 12% by their pediatrician, and 4% by their primary care physician. Physical symptoms, including pain and the surgical wound, were recurrent items of concern. Perception of time to “complete” recovery were less than 3 months (74%), 3 to 6 months (16%), and more than 6 months (10%). Donors’ return to physical activities was shown by above-mean McMaster physical scores; scores for social and emotional health were not different from population data. There were no reported changes in sexual function or menstruation after donation, and five of six donors procreated. Donors overwhelmingly endorsed living donation regardless of recipient outcome or the occurrence of a complication. Eighty-nine percent advocated “increased” application of living donation beyond “emergency situations,” and no donor responded that living donation should be abandoned or that he or she felt “forced” to donate.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Single-center analysis of the first 40 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants using the right lobeLiver Transplantation, 2000
- Impact of segmental grafts on pediatric liver transplantation—A review of the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific registry data (1990–1996)Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1999
- ANALYSIS OF POSTOPERATIVE LIVER FUNCTION OF DONORS IN LIVING-RELATED LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1998
- Donor selection limits use of living-related liver transplantationHepatology, 1995
- Safety Of The Donor In Living-Related Liver Transplantation-An Analysis Of 100 Parental DonorsTransplantation, 1995
- Measuring quality of life in stroke.Stroke, 1993
- Segmental orthotopic hepatic transplantation as a means to improve patient survival and diminish waiting-list mortalityJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1991
- Application of Reduced-size Liver Transplants as Split Grafts, Auxiliary Orthotopic Grafts, and Living Related Segmental TransplantsAnnals of Surgery, 1990
- Successful Liver Transplantation from a Living Donor to Her SonNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FROM LIVE DONORSThe Lancet, 1989