An economic and quality‐of‐life assessment of basiliximab vs antithymocyte globulin immunoprophylaxis in renal transplantation
Open Access
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 16 (5) , 1028-1033
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/16.5.1028
Abstract
Background. Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin A has substantially improved clinical outcomes for renal transplantation. Whether basiliximab (a chimeric monoclonal antibody) demonstrates economic and quality‐of‐life advantages over other induction therapies has not yet been shown. Methods. A multi‐centre open‐label clinical trial was conducted among renal transplant recipients in the US, in which patients were randomized into two induction therapy regimens: basiliximab and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. Medical resources used and a EuroQol visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of quality of life were collected prospectively for the 135 dosed subjects for a period of 1 year post‐treatment. We analysed the differences between treatment groups in 1‐year costs and 1‐year quality‐adjusted survival. We also conducted a post hoc analysis of outcomes among the subgroup of patients identified as high risk. Results. A significant difference was observed in first‐year post‐treatment costs (basiliximab, $45857; ATG, $54729; difference, $8872 (95% CI, $1169 to $16573). The savings from basiliximab can be attributed to the less expensive induction therapy (basiliximab, $2378; ATG, $8670; difference, $6292 (95% CI, $5165 to $7419)) and other savings during the initial hospitalization totalling $2609. One‐year quality‐adjusted survival was the same in both groups (basiliximab, 81.5; ATG, 81.1; difference, 0.45 (95% CI, −5.9 to 6.8)). The results of the post hoc analysis of the 48 high‐risk patients were comparable to the analysis of all patients. Conclusions. These results demonstrate lower first‐year post‐treatment costs in renal‐transplant recipients receiving basiliximab compared to ATG with no differences in quality‐adjusted survival. The results also suggest similar differences among high‐risk subjects.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SIMULECT® WITH EARLY NEORAL® VS. ATGAM® WITH DELAYED NEORAL® IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION. A 6-MONTH INTERIM ANALYSIS.Transplantation, 1999
- A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLINDED COMPARISON OF THYMOGLOBULIN VERSUS ATGAM FOR INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY IN ADULT RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1,2Transplantation, 1999
- REDUCTION OF THE OCCURRENCE OF ACUTE CELLULAR REJECTION AMONG RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS TREATED WITH BASILIXIMAB, A CHIMERIC ANTI-INTERLEUKIN-2-RECEPTOR MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY1,2Transplantation, 1999
- Daclizumab: outcome of phase III trials and mechanism of actionTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- RESULTS OF THE DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, PHASE III CLINICAL TRIAL OF THYMOGLOBULIN VERSUS ATGAM IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE GRAFT REJECTION EPISODES AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1,2Transplantation, 1998
- Placebo-Controlled Study of a Humanized Anti-TAC Monoclonal Antibody in Dual Therapy for Prevention of Acute Rejection After Renal TransplantationTransplantation Proceedings, 1998
- The Effect of Antilymphocyte Induction Therapy on Renal Allograft SurvivalAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Thymoglobulin reverses acute renal allograft rejection better than ATGAM—A double-blinded randomized clinical trialTransplantation Proceedings, 1997
- Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipientsThe Lancet, 1997
- MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1995