Measurement of pain: Patient preference does not confound pain measurement
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 10 (2) , 241-248
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8
Abstract
Chronic pain patients reported pain intensity on each of 3 pain intensity scales, the visual analog, numerical and adjectival scales, and then ranked the scales in order of perceived best communication of pain intensity. All patients were able to complete an adjectival scale but 11% were unable to complete a visual analog scale and 2% failed at a numeric scale. The intensity of the pain ratings on the 3 scales were significantly correlated and there were no reliable differences in reported intensity as a function of preference. Pain intensity was reliably higher on each scale for depressed-anxious patients as compared to non-depressed/non-anxious patients. Patients completing all 3 scales indicated a significant preference for the adjectival scale but the basis for this preference did not appear related to sex, etiology of pain, affective variables nor selected psychological variables. Pain scale preference does not influence pain intensity report. There are some clinical situations in which a numeric scale is likely to yield a better measure of pain intensity.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The pain profile: a computerized system for assessment of chronic painPain, 1978
- The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating painAnaesthesia, 1976
- Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scalePain, 1975
- The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methodsPain, 1975
- MEASUREMENT OF PAINPublished by Elsevier ,1974
- ETHNIC DIFFERENCES AMONG HOUSEWIVES IN PSYCHOPHYSICAL ANH SKIN POTENTIAL RESPONSES TO ELECTRIC SHOCKPsychophysiology, 1965
- RELATIONSHIP OF SIGNIFICANCE OF WOUND TO PAIN EXPERIENCEDJAMA, 1956