Can Categorical and Dimensional Views of Psychiatric Illness be Distinguished?
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 151 (3) , 355-361
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.151.3.355
Abstract
Bimodality in a distribution of symptoms is often claimed to be convincing evidence that a disorder is categorical, a discrete disease entity, rather than the extreme on a continuous dimension. However, using concepts from contemporary psychometric theory it is shown that bimodality can arise from the dimensional viewpoint. In fact, contrary to the usual belief, bimodality would be expected to occur in many research contexts if the dimensional alternative were correct.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Application of modern psychometric theory in psychiatric researchJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1985
- The syndrome concept: history and statistical operationalizationsPsychological Medicine, 1984
- The Identification of Disease Entities and the Relationship between Schizophrenic and Affective PsychosesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- Multivariate Statistical Methods and Problems of Classification in PsychiatryThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- Classification of the depressive disorders by numerical typologyJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1972
- Multivariate Statistical Methods and Classification ProblemsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971
- The Classification of Depression by Numerical TaxonomyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1969
- An important source of bias affecting ratings made by psychiatristsJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1968
- The Establishment of a Psychiatric SyndromeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1966
- The Diagnosis of Depressive Syndromes and the Prediction of E.C.T. ResponseThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1965