Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 56 (2) , 531-563
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00336
Abstract
We document that purchasing (selling short) stocks with the most (least) favorable consensus recommendations, in conjunction with daily portfolio rebalancing and a timely response to recommendation changes, yield annual abnormal gross returns greater than four percent. Less frequent portfolio rebalancing or a delay in reacting to recommendation changes diminishes these returns; however, they remain significant for the least favorably rated stocks. We also show that high trading levels are required to capture the excess returns generated by the strategies analyzed, entailing substantial transactions costs and leading to abnormal net returns for these strategies that are not reliably greater than zero.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual InvestorsThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- The Cost of Institutional Equity TradesCFA Magazine, 1998
- Caveat Compounder: A Warning about Using the Daily CRSP Equal‐Weighted Index to Compute Long‐Run Excess ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?The Journal of Finance, 1996
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Biases in computed returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1983
- Giraffes, Institutions and Neglected FirmsCFA Magazine, 1983
- The value line enigma (1965–1978): A case study of performance evaluation issuesJournal of Financial Economics, 1982
- An Analysis of Brokerage House Securities RecommendationsCFA Magazine, 1979
- How Good is Institutional Brokerage Research?The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1977