Substrate and Inhibitor-Induced Conformational Changes in the Structurally Related Enzymes UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine Enolpyruvyl Transferase (MurA) and 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate 3-Phosphate Synthase (EPSPS)

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) and 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) have both a unique three-dimensional topology and overall reaction mechanism in common. In the case of MurA, the substrate-free, unliganded protein exhibits an “open” conformation. Upon binding of substrates, the protein forms a much more tightly packed so-called “closed” form following an induced fit mechanism. In this closed form, the substrates are properly positioned for catalysis. On the basis of the structural and mechanistic similarities of MurA and EPSPS, a similar conformational change is likely to occur in EPSPS to generate a catalytically competent active site. However, there is currently little experimental evidence available to support the occurrence of such a conformational change in EPSPS. Using limited tryptic digestion of MurA,1 it could be shown that formation of the “closed” conformation of MurA is accompanied by a marked increase of stability toward proteolytic degradation. Formation of the closed conformation was achieved by addition of either an excess of both substrates or the sugar nucleotide substrate in conjunction with the antibiotic fosfomycin. Analysis of the MurA tryptic fragments by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry demonstrates that the protection of the protein in either case is caused by (1) a specific shielding of regions thereby becoming less accessible as a result of the conformational change, and (2) an unspecific overall protection of the whole protein due to an apparently reduced flexibility of the peptide backbone in the binary and ternary complexes. The establishment of methods to describe the effects of tryptic digestion on MurA under various conditions was then extended to EPSPS. Although EPSPS was found to be much more stable toward proteolysis than MurA, the presence of shikimate 3-phosphate (S3P) and the inhibitor glyphosate led to a pronounced suppression of proteolytic degradation. When unliganded EPSPS was treated with trypsin, three of the peptide fragments obtained could be identified by mass spectrometry. Two of these are located in a region corresponding to the “catalytic” loop in MurA which participates in the conformational change. This indicates a conformational change in EPSPS, similar to the one observed in MurA, leading to the protection mentioned above. Corroborating evidence was obtained using a conformational sensitive monoclonal antibody against EPSPS which showed a 20-fold reduced affinity toward the protein complexed with S3P and glyphosate as compared to the unliganded enzyme.