Death qualification and conviction proneness:witt andwitherspoon compared
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 5 (4) , 479-494
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370050411
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986
- After Hovey: A note on taking account of the automatic death penalty jurors.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Determining the neutrality of death-qualified juries: Judicial appraisal of empirical data.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Psychologists as consultants for changes of venue: The use of public opinion surveys.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and RetentionistsCrime & Delinquency, 1983
- Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?Law & Society Review, 1982
- Perceptions of Violence, Concern about Crime, Fear of Victimization and Attitudes to the Death PenaltyCanadian Journal of Criminology, 1979