Prospective Independent Validation of IMPACT Modeling as a Prognostic Tool in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 29 (1) , 47-52
- https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1482
Abstract
Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been fraught with failure due in part to heterogeneity in pathology and insensitive outcome measurements. The International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) prognostic model has been purposed as a means of risk adjustment and outcome prediction for use in trial design and analysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the IMPACT model in predicting 6-month functional outcome and mortality using prospectively collected data at a large, Level 1 neurotrauma center. This population-based cohort study included all TBI patients ≥14 years of age admitted with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤8 (severe TBI) to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between July 1994 and May 2009. Clinical data were prospectively collected and linked to 6-month functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]) and mortality. The discriminatory power and calibration of the three iterations of the IMPACT model (core, extended, and lab) were assessed using multiple regression analyses and indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A sample of 587 patients was available for analysis; the mean age was 37.8±17 years. The median 6-month GOS was 3 (IQR 3); 6-month mortality was 41%. The prognostic models were composed of age, motor score, and pupillary reactivity (core model), Marshall grade on head CT and secondary insults (extended), and laboratory values (lab); all of these displayed good prediction ability for unfavorable outcome and mortality (unfavorable outcome AUC=0.76, 0.79, 0.76; mortality AUC=0.78, 0.83, 0.83, respectively). All model iterations displayed adequate calibration for predicting unfavorable outcome and mortality. Prospective, independent validation supports the IMPACT prognostic model's prediction of patient 6-month functional status and mortality after severe TBI. The IMPACT prognostic model is an effective instrument to assist TBI study design and analysis.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission CharacteristicsPLoS Medicine, 2008
- A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patientsBMJ, 2008
- Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Validation of a Prognostic Score Based on Admission CharacteristicsJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Design and Analysis of Phase III Trials with Ordered Outcome Scales: The Concept of the Sliding DichotomyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2005
- Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regressionJournal of Neurosurgery, 2002
- Why Have Recent Trials of Neuroprotective Agents in Head Injury Failed to Show Convincing Efficacy? A Pragmatic Analysis and Theoretical ConsiderationsNeurosurgery, 1999
- EditorialJournal of Neurotrauma, 1996
- Systematic Selection of Prognostic Features in Patients with Severe Head InjuryNeurosurgery, 1980
- PREDICTING OUTCOME IN INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS AFTER SEVERE HEAD INJURYThe Lancet, 1976