When Optimal Choices Feel Wrong: A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating, Complexity, and Affect
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 95 (4) , 1300-1309
- https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825583
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A violation of the monotonicity axiom: experimental evidence on the conjunction fallacyJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000
- Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form GamesEconometrica, 1999
- Errors in probability updating behaviour: Measurement and impact analysisJournal of Economic Psychology, 1998
- Case-Based Decision TheoryThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995
- Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate termGames and Economic Behavior, 1995
- Testing bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidenceJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1992
- Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness HeuristicThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973
- Subjective probability: A judgment of representativenessCognitive Psychology, 1972
- Belief in the law of small numbers.Psychological Bulletin, 1971