Mechanical Obstruction of the Olfactory Cleft Reveals Differences Between Orthonasal and Retronasal Olfactory Functions
Open Access
- 23 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Chemical Senses
- Vol. 31 (1) , 27-31
- https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjj002
Abstract
Following up on recent observations in patients with nasal polyposis (NP), the present study aimed to investigate whether a mechanical obstruction of the anterior olfactory cleft (OC) would produce differential effects on orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions. To this end, we studied 33 healthy subjects in a randomized trial. Sponges with high content of saline were either placed in the OC or on the respiratory epithelium, such that this was blinded to both subject and observer. The results indicated that orthonasal (P = 0.04) but not retronasal (P = 0.15) olfactory identification ability was lower when the OC was blocked. This confirms the idea that differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions, as observed in NP patients, are, at least to some degree, due to mechanical obstruction of the anterior portion of the OC. The present data also suggest that mechanical obstruction is a means to induce reversible hyposmia void of side effects which can be performed in a blinded fashion. This might become a valuable model of hyposmia for future investigations.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Neural Responses Evoked by Orthonasal versus Retronasal Odorant Perception in HumansNeuron, 2005
- Effects of drugs on olfaction and tasteOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 2004
- Anesthesia affects olfaction and chemosensory event-related potentialsClinical Neurophysiology, 2004
- Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brainNature Neuroscience, 2002
- Decreased Trigeminal Sensitivity in AnosmiaORL, 2001
- The first attempt at radioisotopic evaluation of the integrity of the nose-brain barrierLife Sciences, 1997
- Loss of Olfactory Function Leads to a Decrease of Trigeminal SensitivityChemical Senses, 1996
- Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosaElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1988
- Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritationNature, 1980
- CONTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGEMINAL NERVE TO PERCEIVED ODOR MAGNITUDE*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1974