Who receives lipid‐lowering drugs: the effects of comorbidities and patient characteristics on treatment initiation
Open Access
- 10 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 55 (3) , 288-298
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01724.x
Abstract
Aims Little is known about the effects of comorbidities and patient characteristics on treatment initiation of lipid‐lowering drugs (LLDs), which can be helpful in the evaluation of the risks and benefits of LLDs. Methods Baseline characteristics among subjects who received their first ever‐recorded LLD prescription in general practice between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1997, and hyperlipidaemic patients without LLD therapy during the same period were obtained from the UK General Practice Research Database. Differences between patients who received and patients who did not receive LLDs, as well as patients who received different classes of LLDs were compared by fitting multivariate logistic regression models that adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and year of treatment initiation or hyperlipidaemia diagnosis. Results We found that there were many differences in the baseline characteristics, such as number of general practitioner visits, diagnosis and severity of cardiovascular diseases, and concurrent medications, between the 25 331 patients who received and the 16 287 patients who did not receive LLDs. We also noted that patients with statin therapy had more prior hospitalization, more recent myocardial infarction/stroke, and more concurrent cardiovascular medications, than those patients who received other LLDs. Conclusions Patients who received LLDs in primary care, especially patients with statin therapy, were more likely to be elderly and to have more concomitant severe cardiovascular comorbidities than those hyperlipidaemic patients who did not receive LLDs. Examining the medical records of individuals eligible for LLD therapy is an important first step in selectively targeting who will experience the greatest benefit to risk ratio for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia, and is an important step in avoiding confounding by indication when designing epidemiological studies comparing the risks and benefits of treatments for hyperlipidaemia.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statins and the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolismBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2002
- A comparison of the use, effectiveness and safety of bezafibrate, gemfibrozil and simvastatin in normal clinical practice using the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP)British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1999
- Cholesterol-reduction intervention study (CRIS): a randomized trial to assess effectiveness and costs in clinical practiceArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)The Lancet, 1994
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Further validation of information recorded on a general practitioner based computerized data resource in the united kingdomPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 1992
- Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom.BMJ, 1991
- Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-Prevention Trial with Gemfibrozil in Middle-Aged Men with DyslipidemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Colestipol hydrochloride in hypercholesterolemic patients—Effect on serum cholesterol and mortalityJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978