Phase II randomised trial comparing docetaxel given every 3 weeks with weekly schedule as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 16 (1) , 90-96
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi018
Abstract
Background: Taxotere® (docetaxel) at the dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is a standard therapy for pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of two schedules of docetaxel administration (every 3 weeks versus weekly) in patients with pretreated NSCLC. Patients and methods: From February 2000 to February 2001, 125 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomised after failure of a previous platinum-based regimen to receive either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks (Dq3w) or docetaxel 40 mg/m2 given weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (Dqw). Safety evaluations focused on grade 3–4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, nausea-vomiting and asthenia. Results: Patients' characteristics were well balanced between arms. The most common National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia, which occurred in 48.4% of Dq3w patients versus 15.9% of Dqw patients (P=0.001). In addition, febrile neutropenia were observed in 6.5% of patients in Dq3w versus 0% in Dqw. Grade 3–4 asthenia was more frequent in Dqw. Other non-haematological toxicities were very rare. Regarding efficacy, there was a trend towards a better disease control rate in Dq3w: 32.2% versus 25.4% in Dqw. Median time to progression and survival were rather similar in both arms, respectively: 2.1 months (range 2–3.2) and 5.8 months (range 4.0–7.0) in Dq3w and 1.8 months (range 1.6–2.3) and 5.5 months (range 3.7–6.6) in Dqw. Conclusions: While both schedules had a favourable safety profile, a significant lower rate of severe neutropenia was observed in the weekly arm. Both regimens had similar efficacy. The weekly regimen could be considered as a good alternative for patients at risk of severe neutropenia.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Cancer Statistics, 2004CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2004
- Randomised, multicentre phase II study assessing two doses of docetaxel (75 or 100 mg/m2) as second-line monotherapy fornon-small-cell lung cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2004
- Second-Line Chemotherapy in Relapsing or Refractory Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A ReviewJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy RegimensJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Activity of Docetaxel in Platinum-Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase II Multicenter TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Phase I trial of docetaxel administered by weekly infusion in patients with advanced refractory cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1995
- Chemotherapy of Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992