Analysis of Body Segment Parameter Differences Between Four Human Populations and the Estimation Errors of Four Popular Mathematical Models
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by ASME International in Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Vol. 125 (4) , 515-522
- https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1590359
Abstract
Calculating the kinetics of motion using inverse or forward dynamics methods requires the use of accurate body segment inertial parameters. The methods available for calculating these body segment parameters (BSPs) have several limitations and a main concern is the applicability of predictive equations to several different populations. This study examined the differences in BSPs between 4 human populations using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), developed linear regression equations to predict mass, center of mass location (CM) and radius of gyration (K) in the frontal plane on 5 body segments and examined the errors produced by using several BSP sources in the literature. Significant population differences were seen in all segments for all populations and all BSPs except hand mass, indicating that population specific BSP predictors are needed. The linear regression equations developed performed best overall when compared to the other sources, yet no one set of predictors performed best for all segments, populations or BSPs. Large errors were seen with all models which were attributed to large individual differences within groups. Equations which account for these differences, including measurements of limb circumferences and breadths may provide better estimations. Geometric models use these parameters, however the models examined in this study did not perform well, possibly due to the assumption of constant density or the use of an overly simple shape. Creating solids which account for density changes or which mimic the mass distribution characteristics of the segment may solve this problem. Otherwise, regression equations specific for populations according to age, gender, race, and morphology may be required to provide accurate estimations of BSPs for use in kinetic equations of motion.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The application of segment axial density profiles to a human body inertia modelJournal of Biomechanics, 1995
- The Study of Human Body Segment Parameters in BiomechanicsSports Medicine, 1994
- Adjustments to the segment center of mass proportions of Clauser et al. (1969)Journal of Biomechanics, 1990
- Determination of the moment of inertia of limb segments by a simple methodJournal of Biomechanics, 1985
- Regression equations to predict segmental moments of inertia from anthropometric measurements: An extension of the data of Chandler et al. (1975)Journal of Biomechanics, 1985
- Anatomical Data for Analyzing Human MotionResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1983
- Evaluation of cross-sectional geometry and mass density distributions of humans and laboratory animals using computerized tomographyJournal of Biomechanics, 1983
- A mathematical model for the computational determination of parameter values of anthropomorphic segmentsJournal of Biomechanics, 1980
- Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric methodJournal of Biomechanics, 1978
- DIE MASSENANTEILE DER EINZELNEN KÖRPERABSCHNITTE DER JAPANERCells Tissues Organs, 1959