Soil nitrification as affected by N fertility and changes in forest floor C/N ratio in four forest soils

Abstract
Potential and actual nitrification were compared between a high and low N fertility Inceptisol in Washington State and between two Tennessee Ultisols to investigate the effect of soil N status and changes in forest floor C/N ratio on NO3-N production. Soil and soil solution data were collected (i) prior to treatment, (ii) after doubling the forest floor C/N ratio with sawdust, and (iii) after doubling the forest floor N content by adding urea N to each of the four forest types. Nitrate N production during aerobic soil incubation before and 1 year after treatment demonstrated significantly higher nitrification capacity of the N-rich Washington soil under alder, the stimulatory effect of N addition, and the suppressing effect of C on nitrification. Our study also indicated that the N fertility status was not as different between the Tennessee soils as originally assumed, that both soils in fact behaved similarly to the N-poor Washingon soil, and that these three soils should be considered in the same category of low N fertility sites. Nitrate concentrations in soil and soil solution samples collected in the field generally agreed with the laboratory findings, but differences in NO3 leaching between the untreated soils and between treatments were often less pronounced. Soil solution NO3 concentrations were 3 solution concentration was 0.4 mmol/L. Spring application of urea N caused an immediate and significant increase in NO3 solution concentration in all four soils, but the treatment effect subsided by the end of the 2nd year in all cases. Adding C to the forest floor did not further reduce already low NO3 solution levels in the two Tennessee soils and the N-poor Washington soil. This treatment did not cause a prolonged reduction in NO3 leaching from the N-rich Washington soil, and it was speculated that this was due to belowground N addition from the root system of the N-fixing alder at this site.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: