Comments on articles by frijda and by conway and bekerian
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion
- Vol. 1 (2) , 193-197
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408045
Abstract
Evidence offered by Frijda and by Conway and Bekerian tells us less directly than might be thought about how people mentally represent emotion–and even less directly about emotion itself. For example, people seem to distinguish between types of emotion largely on the basis of situational antecedents, but the precise form and content of the mental representation of situational antecedents and their link to emotion remains unclear.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Situational knowledge and emotionsCognition and Emotion, 1987
- Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendencyCognition and Emotion, 1987
- The grouping of affect terms according to the situations that elicit them: A test of a cognitive theory of emotionJournal of Research in Personality, 1986
- A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotionMotivation and Emotion, 1986
- Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.Psychological Review, 1986
- Reliability of accuracy and intensity judgments of eliciting situations of emotions.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 1986
- Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1984
- Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes Among EmotionsScience, 1983
- Judgment of EmotionJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1981
- Psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist, 1981