The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care
Open Access
- 11 October 2010
- Vol. 117 (1) , 180-189
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25542
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few data are available on how race/ethnicity, insurance, and socioeconomic status (SES) interrelate to influence breast cancer treatment. The authors examined care for a national cohort of breast cancer patients to assess whether insurance and SES were associated with racial/ethnic differences in care. METHODS: The authors used multivariate logistic regression to assess the probability of definitive locoregional therapy, hormone receptor testing, and adjuvant systemic therapy among 662,117 white, black, and Hispanic women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1998-2005 at National Cancer Data Base hospitals. In additional models, the authors included insurance and area-level SES to determine whether these variables were associated with observed racial/ethnic disparities. RESULTS: Most women were white (86%), 10% were black, and 4% were Hispanic. Most had private insurance (51%) or Medicare (41%). Among eligible patients, 80.0% (stage I/II) had definitive locoregional therapy, 98.5% (stage I-IV) had hormone receptor testing, and 53.1% and 50.2% (stage I-III) received adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy, respectively. After adjustment, black (vs white) women had less definitive locoregional therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.94), hormonal therapy (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93), and chemotherapy (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.91). Hispanic (vs white) women were also less likely to receive hormonal therapy. Hormone receptor testing did not differ by race/ethnicity. Racial disparities persisted despite adjusting for insurance and SES. CONCLUSIONS: The modest association between black (vs white) race and guideline-recommended breast cancer care was insensitive to adjustment for insurance and area-level SES. Further study is required to better understand disparities and to ensure receipt of care. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10.1007/b97251Published by Springer Nature ,2011
- Underuse of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: Patient Knowledge, Beliefs, and Medical MistrustJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Disparities in medical care among commercially insured patients with newly diagnosed breast cancerCancer, 2009
- Comparison of Commission on Cancer–Approved and –Nonapproved Hospitals in the United States: Implications for Studies That Use the National Cancer Data BaseJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Perceptions of Breast Cancer Treatment among African-American Women and Men: Implications for InterventionsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Early Stage Breast Cancer Treatments for Younger Medicare Beneficiaries with Different DisabilitiesHealth Services Research, 2008
- Race/ethnicity and breast cancer estrogen receptor status: impact of class, missing data, and modeling assumptionsCancer Causes & Control, 2008
- Racial disparities in cancer therapyCancer, 2008
- Parity and disparity in first course treatment of invasive breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2007
- The growth and maturation of the national cancer data baseCancer, 1997