Editorial: Significant Versus Insignificant Prostate Cancer—Can We Identify the Tigers from the Pussy Cats?
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 156 (3) , 1069-1070
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65704-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostate Specific Antigen Detected Prostate Cancer (Clinical Stage T1C): An Interim AnalysisJournal of Urology, 1996
- Prospective characterization of pathological features of Prostatic Carcinomas Detected Via Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Based ScreeningJournal of Urology, 1996
- Failure of Focal Prostate Cancer on Biopsy to Predict Focal Prostate Cancer: The Importance of PrevalenceJournal of Urology, 1995
- The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-based staging, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis in prostate cancerUrology, 1995
- Use of prostate-specific antigen and tumor volume in predicting needle biopsy grading errorUrology, 1995
- The Volume of Prostate Cancer in the Biopsy Specimen Cannot Reliably Predict the Quantity of Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen on an Individual BasisJournal of Urology, 1995
- Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsiesUrology, 1995
- Systematic biopsies accurately predict extracapsular extension of prostate cancer and persistent/recurrent detectable psa after radical prostatectomyUrology, 1994
- Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994