An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health
- 30 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 12 (7) , 545-551
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.760
Abstract
There are a number of perspectives that an individual could be asked to adopt in studies designed to elicit preferences for use in informing resource allocation decisions in health care. This paper develops a conceptual framework that clearly distinguishes between six different perspectives. It is argued that the appropriate perspective to use depends on normative considerations and the particular policy context to which it will be applied. We suggest a future research agenda that explicitly addresses these considerations and which involves direct empirical investigation into the effect of perspective on preferences. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chapter 32 The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health carePublished by Elsevier ,2000
- The importance of Perspective in the Measurement of Quality-adjusted Life YearsMedical Decision Making, 1997
- When Do the "Dollars" Make Sense?Medical Decision Making, 1996
- A note on the estimation of the equity-efficiency trade-off for QALYsJournal of Health Economics, 1996
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in a Setting of Budget Constraints — Is It Equitable?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Person-trade-off Approach to Valuing Health Care ProgramsMedical Decision Making, 1995
- Status-quo and omission biasesJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992
- Value elicitation: Is there anything in there?American Psychologist, 1991
- The Case for a Multiple-Utility ConceptionEconomics and Philosophy, 1986
- Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of UtilityJournal of Political Economy, 1955