Comparison of azelastine nasal spray and oral ebastine in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 13 (6) , 299-304
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007999509110490
Abstract
SummaryThe efficacy and safety of the nasally administered histamine H1 receptor blocking drug azelastine was investigated in a randomized comparative trial with ebastine. Patients were treated for 14 days and efficacy was assessed by the physician using a rating scale measuring 10 nasal and ocular symptoms of seasonal rhinitis (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Tolerability was measured on the basis of reported adverse events. Data from a total of 59 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Both treatment groups had dramatic reductions in the physician's total symptom score following treatment. Mean scores in the azelastine group decreased from 12.4 pretreatment to 5.6, while the mean ebastine scores decreased from 13.6 to 6.6. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.86). Changes in individual rhinitis symptoms showed no differences between the two groups. The majority of patients in both treatment groups reported an initial relief of symptoms within 1 h of...Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- AzelastineDrugs, 1989
- Antagonism of histamine and leukotrienes by azelastine in isolated guinea pig ileumInflammation Research, 1986