Analysis of the Effect of Flow Rate on the Doppler Continuity Equation for Stenotic Orifice Area Calculations
- 28 April 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 97 (16) , 1597-1605
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.16.1597
Abstract
Background —Flow-rate dependencies of the Doppler continuity equation are addressed in this study. Methods and Results —By use of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) software with turbulence modeling, three-dimensional axisymmetric models of round stenotic orifices were created. Flow simulations were run for various orifice area sizes (0.785, 1.13, 1.76, and 3.14 cm 2 ) and flow rates (0.37 to 25.0 L/min). Reynolds numbers ranged from 100 to 8000. Once adequate convergence was obtained with each simulation, the location of the vena contracta was determined. For each run, maximum and average velocities across the cross section of the vena contracta were tabulated and vena contracta cross-sectional area (effective orifice area) determined. The difference between the maximum velocity and the average velocity at the vena contracta was smallest at high-flow states, with more of a difference at low-flow states. At lower-flow states, the velocity vector profile at the vena contracta was parabolic, whereas at high-flow states, the profile became more flattened. Also, the effective orifice area (vena contracta cross-sectional area) varied with flow rate. At moderate-flow states, the effective orifice area reached a minimum and expanded at low- and high-flow states, remaining relatively constant at high-flow states. Conclusions —We have shown that significant differences exist between the maximum velocity and the average velocity at the vena contracta at low flow rates. A likely explanation for this is that viscous effects cause lower velocities at the edges of the vena contracta at low flow rates, resulting in a parabolic profile. At higher-flow states, inertial forces overcome viscous drag, causing a flatter profile. Effective orifice area itself varies with flow rate as well, with the smallest areas seen at moderate-flow states. These flow-dependent factors lead to flow rate–dependent errors in the Doppler continuity equation. Our results have strong relevance to clinical measurements of stenotic valve areas by use of the Doppler continuity equation under varying cardiac output conditions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques to Blood PumpsArtificial Organs, 1996
- Hysteresis behavior of stenotic aortic bioprosthesis as a function of flow rate: In vitrostudiesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- General strong conservation formulation of Navier-Stokes equations in nonorthogonal curvilinear coordinatesAIAA Journal, 1994
- Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areasThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Validation and applications of mitral prosthetic valvular areas calculated by Doppler echocardiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula.Circulation, 1985
- Noninvasive quantification of stenotic semilunar valve areas by doppler echocardiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flowsInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1972