CT and PET: Early Prognostic Indicators of Response to Imatinib Mesylate in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 189 (6) , W324-W330
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.2496
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. We report results from a pilot study aimed at optimizing the use of CT bidimensional measurements and 18F-FDG PET maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs-max) for determining response to prolonged imatinib mesylate treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixty-three patients enrolled in a multicenter trial evaluating imatinib mesylate therapy for advanced GIST underwent FDG PET at baseline and 1 month after initiation of treatment. Of these 63 patients, 58 underwent concomitant CT. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was used as the outcome measure. Patients were followed up over a range of 23.7 to 37 months (median, 31.7 months). The predictive power of change in CT bidimensional measurements, change in PET SUVmax, and PET SUVmax at 1 month after initiation of treatment were determined, optimized, and compared. The effectiveness of combining metrics was also evaluated. RESULTS. Both a threshold PET SUVmax value of 2.5 at 1 month (p = 0.04) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria for partial response on FDG PET (25% reduction in PET SUVmax) at 1 month (p = 0.004) were predictive of prolonged treatment success. The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria for partial response (3 50% reduction in CT bidimensional measurements) at 1 month were not predictive (p = 0.55) of TTF. Optimizing metrics improved results performance. An optimized PET SUVmax threshold of 3.4 (p = 0.00002), a reduction in the SUVmax of 40% (p = 0.002), and an optimized CT bidimensional measurement threshold—that is, no growth from baseline to 1 month (p = 0.00005)—outperformed the existing standards (i.e., EORTC and SWOG criteria). Combinations of metrics did not improve performance. CONCLUSION. The two best metrics were the optimized PET SUVmax threshold of 3.4 at 1 month (p = 0.00002) and the optimized CT bidimensional measurement threshold (no growth from baseline to 1 month, p = 0.00005) in this patient group.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- We Should Desist Using RECIST, at Least in GISTJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Erlotinib in Lung Cancer — Molecular and Clinical Predictors of OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Determinants of Tumor Response and Survival With Erlotinib in Patients With Non—Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Mesylate in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Effect of the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor STI571 in a Patient with a Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- KIT Extracellular and Kinase Domain Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsThe American Journal of Pathology, 2000
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendationsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1999
- Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents countsIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1990
- ROC Methodology in Radiologic ImagingInvestigative Radiology, 1986