Efficacy of Several Serological Tests and Antigens for Diagnosis of Bovine Brucellosis in the Presence of False-Positive Serological Results Due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
- Vol. 12 (1) , 141-51
- https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.12.1.141-151.2005
Abstract
Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 bears a smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS) of Brucella sp. O-chain A + C/Y epitopic structure and is a cause of false-positive serological reactions (FPSR) in standard tests for cattle brucellosis. Brucella S-LPS, cross-reacting S-LPSs representing several O-chain epitope combinations, Brucella core lipid A epitopes (rough LPS), Brucella abortus S-LPS-derived polysaccharide, native hapten polysaccharide, rough LPS group 3 outer membrane protein complexes, recombinant BP26, and cytosolic proteins were tested in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and precipitation tests to detect cattle brucellosis (sensitivity) and to differentiate it from FPSR (specificity). No single serological test and antigen combination showed 100% sensitivity and specificity simultaneously. Immunoprecipitation tests with native hapten polysaccharide, counterimmunoelectrophoresis with cytosolic proteins, and a chaotropic ELISA with Brucella S-LPS were 100% specific but less sensitive than the Rose Bengal test, complement fixation, and indirect ELISA with Brucella S-LPSs and native hapten or S-LPS-derived polysaccharides. A competitive ELISA with Brucella S-LPS and M84 C/Y-specific monoclonal antibody was not 100% specific and was less sensitive than other tests. ELISA with Brucella suis bv. 2 S-LPS (deficient in C epitopes), Escherichia hermannii S-LPSs [lacking the contiguous α-(1-2)-linked perosamine residues characteristic of Y. enterocolitica S-LPS], BP26 recombinant protein, and Brucella cytosolic fractions did not provide adequate sensitivity/specificity ratios. Although no serological test and antigen combination fully resolved the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of FPSR, some are simple and practical alternatives to the brucellin skin test currently recommended for differential diagnosis.Keywords
This publication has 104 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7Veterinary Microbiology, 2004
- Characterization of Brucella abortus O-Polysaccharide and Core Lipopolysaccharide Mutants and Demonstration that a Complete Core Is Required for Rough Vaccines To Be Efficient against Brucella abortus and Brucella ovis in the Mouse ModelInfection and Immunity, 2003
- Comparison of the Antibody Response in Adult Cattle Against Different Epitopes of Brucella abortus LipopolysaccharideJournal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B, 2001
- Use of Recombinant BP26 Protein in Serological Diagnosis of Brucella melitensis Infection in SheepClinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2001
- Molecular and immunological characterization of the major outer membrane proteins ofBrucellaFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1996
- Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic testsVeterinary Microbiology, 1996
- Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I Immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosisVeterinary Microbiology, 1995
- Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminantsVeterinary Microbiology, 1995
- The Serological Response of Cattle Immunized with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 or O:16 to Yersinia and Brucella abortus Antigens in Enzyme ImmunoassaysVeterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 1990
- A New Method for the Extraction of R LipopolysaccharidesEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1969